Buyout, takeover or sale.

As at: June 2026

The answer first. Which path will hold is decided not by the price, but by the question of what each person truly needs — attachment, clarity, or their share. Once that is settled, the choice is usually easy.

Often the calmest path: whoever is attached to the house takes it over and pays out the remaining co-heirs. The condition is a fair valuation that everyone can follow — and sound financing. If this succeeds, the house stays in the family, and no one feels short-changed.

The calculation begins with the value: from the market value of the property, the estate’s liabilities are deducted — for instance a registered land charge with a loan still running — and the result is divided by the shares of inheritance. Adjustment items may be added, for example for earlier gifts or for care that someone provided; such points belong openly on the table before anyone signs a figure.

On execution: the transfer of inheritance shares and the division involving a property belong before the notary — the notarial form protects everyone involved and is required for the land register in any case. One point that often surprises: if a co-heir acquires the property in order to divide the estate, as a rule no real-estate transfer tax falls due (section 3 no. 3 GrEStG); the details are clarified by the tax adviser.

On financing: banks examine a payout like a purchase — lending value, income, own funds. The inherited house itself serves as security. If the financing does not hold, there are intermediate forms: staggered payments, offsetting against other estate assets (“you take the securities, I take the house”) — or the honest realisation that the joint sale, or jointly keeping and letting, is the calmer path. Both carry equal weight.

The whole community does not always have to be dissolved. In a severance (Abschichtung), one co-heir leaves the community of heirs against a compensation payment; their share accrues to those who remain. Case law recognises this path, and it is less formal than the purchase of an inheritance share — notarial certification is not mandatory for the exit itself. Even so: a clear written agreement and legal guidance are strongly advisable, and as soon as the land register is to be corrected, formal proof is needed in any case. The severance is particularly suitable when one person wants clarity and their share, while the others still wish to take their time over the way forward.

The figure. The most frequent dispute in communities of heirs is not about the path but about the value. Whoever wishes to take over feels every high figure as a hurdle; whoever is being paid out feels every low one as being short-changed. The way out is a neutral appraisal: an independent expert, commissioned by everyone together, producing a figure everyone can trust. One principle helps: whoever values the property should not at the same time earn from its sale — valuation and marketing belong in separate hands.

The use. If one co-heir lives alone in the jointly owned house, a silent reproach often builds up. The law orders this calmly: the other co-heirs can demand a new arrangement of the use — and, from that demand onwards, compensation for use, as a rule based on the local market rent, in proportion to the shares of inheritance; it is generally not owed retroactively. Usually a clear written agreement is enough. What matters is raising the subject early and without reproach — it does not get smaller by being left alone.

If no one wishes to take over — or the assets are simply to be divided — the joint, orderly sale is usually the most value-preserving path. You keep the timing, the course and the distribution in your own hands. First the agreement, then the market; the marketing we handle in a clean, separate phase.

If no agreement is found, any co-heir can apply for the partition auction (a court-ordered forced sale of jointly owned property). It dissolves the community, but surrenders control: the court sets the pace, the proceeds often fall below value, and the rift in the family remains. It can almost always be avoided — how, you can read under Avoiding a partition auction.

A fourth path exists, even if hardly anyone recommends it: selling one’s own inheritance share to a commercial buyer. It requires notarial certification (section 2371 BGB), and the remaining co-heirs have a statutory right of first refusal on the same terms for two months (section 2034 BGB). Important to know: such buyers typically pay markedly less than the arithmetical value of the share — discounts of 20 to 50 per cent are reported. Whoever seeks quick clarity pays dearly for it on this path; an orderly buyout within the family almost always achieves more. What lies behind the letters of such providers is explained under Understanding buyer letters.

And the taxes? Whether inheritance tax falls due, how periods dating from the deceased’s time continue to run, and what a sale triggers for tax purposes — these are questions for the tax adviser, and they should be asked before anything is signed. The law is clarified by a lawyer, taxes by the tax adviser; we put the conversation and the figures before it in order.

Back to the overview: A community of heirs & the property. Or simply take your bearings first — anonymously, without obligation.

Take your bearings Arrange a callback

This article provides orientation and does not replace legal or tax advice.